Feedback
Argue with the curriculum.
We published it openly because work that can be inspected can be corrected. Chapter 2 asks students to criticise the strongest version of an argument and propose the test that would settle it. Do that to us.
Especially useful
- A factual error, with the chapter and section
- A claim you think we have overstated
- A figure that misleads or confuses
- A resource link that no longer works
If you are a researcher
- We would particularly like to hear from you. Corrections from people who know the field better than we do are the whole reason the curriculum is public.
What happens to it
- Read by Aroob and Haneen, nobody else
- It has no bearing on your marks
- Anonymous means anonymous — no identifier is stored
- If something needs raising formally, use the routes in the code of conduct instead